|
It
is regrettable that an unbridled smear campaign against Hinduism is going on in
a section of English press, which has not been able to exorcise the ghost of
Indian brand of secularism. A spate
of senseless, wild comments, tinged with lunatic outbursts against Hindus have
been surfacing signalling a crescendo of a well-orchestrated campaign of hatred
with innuendo and half truths for quite sometime.
Amid
the furious swirl of an intemperate language, the Hindus not unoften feel if
patience for their faith is being tested in the land of their own.
It is devastating them psychologically except those who are fed on a
brand of secularism, which breathes venom for the majority community.
The
resurgence amongst Hindus over a period of last few years has obliterated all
dividing lines of caste, region or language about which several secularist
scribes, domestic or foreign, were never tired of reminding again and again and
rubbing the entire Hindu community. It
is to their great discomfiture that over-arching Hinduism today enabled Hindus
to submerge their narrow distinctions of caste, creed, language and region into
a larger awakening. This indeed has
made so-called secularist intellectuals mad and off – balance.
This is the reason why they are vituperative, and malicious in their
ranting against Hindus. We are
shocked at the gutter language used in a few prestigious national dailies and
periodicals in our country and abuses heaped against Hindus, often wondering
whether we lived in a Muslim country. The
choicest abuses hurled on the majority faith, unparalleled as they are in scope
and content and the reticence of educated people whose forefathers’ faith is
being trampled upon and spat on ceaselessly is bewildering.
Why
does the very mention of Hinduism arouse negative feelings amongst our
Anglicised elite? Why does their
blood-pressure rise when the word Hinduism is mentioned?
What are they ashamed of? What
is the root cause of their cynical view? The
Indo-Anglican press has the same mindset, which the fanatical drum-beaters of
single-track secularists have been exhibiting.
The omnibus theme is that BJP is a Nazi Party with Hindu Ghazis and
murderers ravaging the nation. Thundering
rhetoric of secularists sadly ignores realities today.
Will
someone stem the degeneration of our misguided media moghuls in the country
whose transparent hostility for Hindus is going on unchecked.
We present a sample of venom purely illustrative, being dished out by a
section of English press in the sequel. Those
who loathe anything that seeks to be constructive and unifying in Hinduism only
indulge in their ravings, which lead them no where.
The
efforts to nail the canard by a few perceptive scribes have to effective even to
face those who have opted to have a blinkered view.
Walter K Anderson in his book ‘The Brotherhood in Saffron’ says:
“there are significant differences with the European expressions of Fascism
that should caution one to handle comparison (between European Fascism and the
RSS) carefully. RSS never sought to destroy or to seize control of all
existing centers of social-political and economic power like fascists do”.
An American sociologist, Matthew A Cook says that if Hindu is an
inclusive term, referring to the entire cultural mosaic of modern day India
“then the correlation between the BJP and the Nazi party in Germany which
revolved round the exclusion and persecution of minority groups is baseless.”
He further said this comparison is malicious because Nazi political
philosophy was what could be called “unity without diversity” But the BJP
did not actively seek to establish a pan –Indian straitjacket.
The BJP – Nazi correlation mischievously propagates a media mischief
belching out hatred for Hindus. Let
us examine the extent of such mischief this secularist elite is capable of. Shri.
M.V. Kamath calls this elite excelling in abuses on Hindus “a conglomeration
of shallow men who think that self – flagellation is co-terminus with
secularism and who desperately seek the plaudits of the minority in their search
for intellectual legitimacy”.
Those
hostile to Hindus are never short of arguments. Sometimes they are critical, at other times they want to tell
us what good Hinduism should be like, which is rather different from what Hindus
think of it. First it was
‘modernisation’ then it was ‘secularism’ and now it is ‘semitisation’.
Under each argument the anti-Hindu theme is presented with a variation.
The intent is to keep Hindus at bay, to debilitate them in their struggle
for a place in the public realm and to deny them an honourable future. Only in
India, with its monstrously alienated intellectuals, is such self – hatred
possible.
|