|
An Islamic religious
scholar issued a "fatwa" about India tennis star Sania Mirza’s dress
code saying that Islam does not permit a woman to wear skirts, shorts and
sleeveless tops.
The Darul Uloom Deoband issued a fatwa against Imrana, who was allegedly
raped by her father-in-law, asking her to marry her father-in-law and treat her
husband like her son.
The Muslim clerics pronounced a
fatwa reuniting Gudia with her first husband, in spite of the fact that she was
happily married and carrying the child of her second husband.
The Muslim clergy in India has been fast in issuing fatwas against some Sania,
Gudia and Imrana, encroaching on their personal lives and human rights in the
name of Shariat and Islam. It seems that the victims of the Muslim clergy and
their interpretation of Shariat and Islam are always innocent women. No Indian
Muslim cleric has dared to issue fatwa against the terrorists or their inhuman
activities. A question that comes to the mind of every Indian is “Why? Is it
lack of courage or willingness or both?”
On the other hand, the so-called progressive Muslim intellectuals in India
have been condemning Islamic terrorism being carried out in the name of Jehad.
They have vehemently defended Jehad and Islam as being essentially peaceful. But
that is not how it is practiced. Nor have the actions of the Indian Muslim
clergy, which is supposed to be more well-read and highly knowledgeable
authorities on Islam, in any way supported the claim of the Muslim scholars.
In sharp contrast to the so-called progressive Muslim intellectuals, the
Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid, Delhi, Syed Ahmed Bukhari has on record defended
Osama, 9/11 and the Taliban. While America’s interference in Iraq and
Afghanistan cannot be justified, nor can be Osama, 9/11 or Taliban. No Indian
Muslim cleric has issued any fatwa against any terrorist. Not even when, some
terrorists killed around ten innocent persons in the quake-hit Kashmir Valley
where lakhs were rendered homeless, spending their nights out in the rain and
snow. Not even when, serial bomb blasts on Diwali eve brought darkness to
hundreds of Indian homes.
No fatwas have been issued against Dawood who master-minded the serial
bomb-blasts in Mumbai. No fatwas were issued against the terrorist groups in the
Kashmir when lakhs of Pandits were violently driven away from their homeland.
Muslim clergy, which is ever ready to issue a fatwa against the slightest
un-Islamic act of the Muslims, has remained quiet when it comes to Jehad or
terrorism. This implies that Islam sanctions these inhuman acts in the name of
Jehad. Seen in this light, the claims of the progressive Muslim intellectuals
and scholars of Islam being a religion of peace looks like a farce. The big
question is “Does Islam sanction shedding innocent blood in the name of Jehad?”
If no, why were no fatwas issued against the terrorists and their supporters in
India? If yes, can humanity afford to practice this kind of Islam?
The bigger question is why should humanity suffer for the correct/incorrect?
interpretation and practice of Jehad or Islam? If Islam does preach a violent
Jehad, that aspect of the Prophet’s teachings need not be adhered to and only
the more relevant aspects of his teachings be followed. Just as Hindus are fast
giving up the caste system, sati and other less humane practices mentioned in
their scriptures, the same could be applicable to the Muslim society. On the
other hand, if Islam does not sanction such violence, then fatwas should be
issued against the self-proclaimed Jehadis and protectors of Islam by the Muslim
clergy, the real authority on Islam. Salman Rushdie and Tasleema Nusreen have
suffered the Muslim ire for their anti-Islamic acts, then why not the
terrorists?
The biggest question is why is the regime of the conservative, fanatic
mullahs and maulavis enjoying state patronage? The British at the time of
independence and the successive Indian governments post independence have always
supported the fanatic Muslim clergy, never caring for the average Muslim
opinion. The British intention of divide and rule can be well-understood though
not justified, but the Indian governments’ love for conservatism can neither
be understood nor justified, especially so when we like to boast of our secular
credentials and liberal outlook.
It is indeed an irony that in a constitutionally declared secular country,
the demand for a uniform civil code for the followers of all religions, is
looked upon as communal by the communalists and their sympathizers, the
so-called “secularists”. A government claiming to be secular went to the
extent of changing the constitution and going against the advice of the apex
court, to appease the fundamentalists, rendering Shah Bano helpless, a victim of
the communal politics of the secularists.
No so-called secular parties or their leaders dared to outright condemn the
inhuman fatwa against Imrana. In fact the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh,
Mulayam Singh Yadav, out of fear of losing his Muslim votebank, went to the
extent of justifying the fatwa saying that it must be a well-thought decision.
The vicious circle of minorityism and vote bank politics has taken its toll.
Partition, Kashmir, terrorism, riots and violence are all the outcome of our
perverted practice of secularism and minorityism. Essentially, the concepts of
secularism and religious minorityism are mutually opposed to each other.
Ideally, a secular country should have nothing to do with minority benefits or
commissions. Yet, we have practiced both the theories together in a skewed
manner, fashioned to benefit a particular minority community inspired by the
selfish motives of vote hungry politicians.
The Muslim clergy should come clear on the issue of Jehad and terrorism. They
owe answers to the rest of the country. They need to tell us which of the two
faces of Islam is correct and, should the Islamic law persist, how they plan to
punish the wrong-doers of their community. This is no longer the internal issue
of the Muslim community since the entire mankind is suffering due to different
interpretations of Jehad. Unless this is done, the moderate voices of the Muslim
intellectuals and scholars have no relevance because they are neither the
preachers nor the decision-making authorities in the Muslim community. The Islam
as interpreted by them remains far from the way it is practiced. They do nothing
more than confusing and misguiding the people. Their rhetoric is like a sick
joke to an innocent person who hears and believes about the lofty ideals of a
peaceful Islam on one day and falls prey to bloodshed and terrorism the next day
which again, has the apparent sanction of Islam.
Also, it is high time that the voice of the moderate, progressive Muslim is
heard by the government, the media and the so-called “intellectuals” in the
society, that we stop promoting Muslim fundamentalism in the name of secularism.
Uniform Civil Code must be implemented and the regime of insane fatwas be
rendered unlawful and abolished. Terrorism and fanaticism in any form should be
strictly dealt with irrespective of the religious banner. We do claim to be a
secular state, let us start acting like one. Time is running out, the mistake of
fifty plus years cannot be undone, but at least we could learn lessons from the
past and refrain from continuing to commit the same mistakes.
|