|
"By rising from its ashes again,
this temple of Somnath will proclaim to the world that no man and no power in
the world can destroy that for which people have boundless faith and love in
their hearts... Today, our attempt is not to rectify history. Our only aim is to
proclaim anew our attachment to the faith, convictions and to the values on
which our religion has rested since immemorial ages."
- Dr. Rajendra Prasad
The shrine of Somnath has risen like the
phoenix from its ruins a number of times. The present shrine is the seventh
temple built on the original site.
A reference of the presiding deity of the
temple, Lord Someshwar is available in the Rig Veda. It was also a sacred place
in the days of the Mahabharat. It was called Bhairavashwar in Satya Yug,
Shravanikeshwar in Treta Yug and Shrigaleshwar in Dwapur Yug. The Prabhas Khanda
in Skand Purana giving description of the Linga of Somnath says that it is a
Swayambhu Linga of great prowess, as bright as the disc of Sun, surrounded by a
serpent, of the size of the egg of a hen, called Sparalinga and situated
underground.
The first temple of Somnath can be said to
have existed about the beginning of the Christian era. The second temple
replaced the first one on the very site somewhere around 649 A.D.
In 725 A.D. Junayad, the Governor of Sind sent
Arab armies and both Vallabhi, the capital of Saurashtra and Prabhas were
destroyed in this onslaught. The second temple was probably destroyed during
this attack. Nagabhatta II, of the later Pratihara line of
Kanauj, constructed the third temple, a large structure of red sandstone
sometime in 815 A.D.
Zeal
for Islam was the dominant role of the tenth-century Turks, as of most new
converts. The great missionary creed of
Mohammed, which to the Arabs and Persians had become a familiar matter of
routine, was a source of fiery inspiration to the untutored men of the steppes.
To spread the faith by conquest doubled their natural zest for battle and
endowed them with the devoted valour of martyrs.
Lane
Poole, author of Medieval India, has said that Mahommad of Ghazni, “who
had vowed that every year should see him wage a holy war against the infidels of
Hindustan” could not rest from his idol-breaking campaign so long as the
temple of Somnath remained inviolate. It was for this specific purpose that he,
at the very close of his career, undertook his arduous march across the desert
from Multan to Anhilwada on the coast, fighting as he went, until he saw at last
the famous temple.
Mahmud Ghazni attacked this temple in 1026
A.D. and after a week-long resistance, captured it. When the soldiers scaled the
walls with ladders all they found inside were defenseless worshippers. Fifty
thousand devotees praying to the linga and weeping passionately with hands
clasped were massacred in cold blood. The Shiva Linga,
adorned with gems and precious stones was broken and the
temple burnt. After the battle, Mahmud
and his troops are described as having carried away across the desert the
equivalent of 6.5 tons of gold. The fragments of the idol were carried off
to grace the conquerors’ palace and the temple gates were set up at Ghazni.
Mahmud was hailed throughout the
Islamic world as a second Mohammed and his smashing of Somnath was lauded in the
Sufi poetry of Attar, Sanai and Omar Khayyam. These poets equated Somnath with
the temples to the pagan goddess Al-Manat destroyed by Mohammed and viewed its
destruction as the 'will of Allah' and the 'enlightened march of Islam.' The sack of Somnath
made Mahmud of Ghazni
a champion of the faith in the eyes of every Muslim.
Minhaj-as-Siraj tells us how Mahmud became widely known for having
destroyed as many as thousand temples, and of his great feat in destroying the
temple of Somnath and carrying off its idol, which he asserts was broken into
four parts. One part he deposited in the Jami Masjid of Ghazni, one he placed at
the entrance of the royal palace, the third he sent to Mecca, and the fourth to
Medina.
The fourth temple was built by King Bhoja Parmar of Malwa and Bhima Chalukya
of Anhilwada Patan during 1024-1042 A.D.
In 1169 A.D. the fifth temple, along with its integrated complex rose again
during the reign of Kumarapala, the Chalukya King of Anhilwada Patan, Pasupat
Acharya Bhava Brahaspati being the head of the shrine. Chalukya King Bhimadeva
II added Megalanad Mandap in 1216 A.D. In 1287 A.D. further additions were made
to the temple by Pasupat Acharya Tripurantaka under Sarang Deva Vaghela, King of
Gujarat.
Then came the
invasion of Allauddin Khilji's general Alaf Khan, who captured and once again destroyed the temple
and idol in 1296 A.D. According to Taj-ul-Ma'sir of Hasan Nizami, Raja Karan of
Gujarat was defeated and forced to flee, "fifty thousand infidels were
dispatched to hell by the sword" and "more than twenty thousand
slaves, and cattle beyond all calculation fell into the hands of the
victors".
This fifth destroyed temple was repaired by Mahipala Deva, the
Chudasama king of Saurashtra in 1308 A.D. and the Linga was installed by his son Khengar
sometime between 1326 and 1351 A.D.
In 1375 A.D., the temple was once again destroyed by Muzaffar Shah I, the
Sultan of Gujarat. About 1400 A.D. it was reconstructed by the local
public.
In the year 1451 A.D. Mahmud Begda became the Sultan of Gujarat. In few years
he became very powerful and after continuously attacking the Hindu rulers of
Junagadh for five years, he finally defeated them in 1469 A.D. and the temple
once again faced destruction. The idol was removed from the temple and the
temple was desecrated. The temples in the entire state were demolished and
Hindus were forcefully converted to Islam.
In 1560 A.D., possibly after Akbar's conquest of Somnath, extensive repairs
and renovation of the temple was carried out. During Akbar's reign the temple
remained unmolested.
Thus, the Hindus rebuilt the temple several times, but the Muslims destroyed it
again. The temple was last destroyed by the Mughal tyrant, Aurangzeb. In 1701 A.D.
he ordered Prince Mohammed Azam, the Viceroy of Gujarat, to destroy the temple of
Somnath. Aurangzeb, as history records, was a brutal ruler who left a trail of
genocide and destruction, mainly aimed at converting Hindus. Aurangzeb built a
mosque on the site of the Somnath temple, using some columns from the temple,
whose Hindu sculptural motifs remained visible.
Queen Ahilyabai Holkar of Indore built the temple again in 1783 at a site adjacent to the ruined temple.
Somnath, thus, withstood the shocks of time and the attacks of the
destroyers. Aged, infirm, desecrated it stood up once again when Sardar
Vallabhbhai Patel, the Deputy Prime Minister of India, rescued it from neglect
and pledged on November 13, 1947 for its reconstruction. Mahatma Gandhi also
approved of the retaking of Somnath but did not live to see it happen.
Bhoomi-Khana for the Garbha-Grih was performed by Shri U.N. Dhebar on April 8,
1950 and Maharaja Jamsaheb Digwijay Singhji laid the foundation stone on May 8,
1950. The Linga Pratishtha ceremony was performed by the first President of
India, Dr. Rajendra Prasad on May 11, 1951. On December 1, 1995 the President of
India, Dr. Shankar Dayal Sharma, performed the Kalash Pratishtha of the temple's
Nritya Mandap and dedicated the temple to the nation.
If Hindus honor Somnath, they should not look down upon attempts to restore
Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi, but, on the contrary, help accomplish this aim. If
Somnath is a matter of national pride, then certainly Ayodhya and the others
deserve to be as well. If a legal process could be created to reclaim Somnath, a
similar process can be created to reclaim these other three sites. If Somnath
can be dedicated to the nation, so can the other sites.
|